[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3fc3338-c469-0c0c-ada2-a0bbc9f969fe@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:53:48 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Oleg Rombakh <olegrom@...gle.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: cgroup SCHED_IDLE support
Hi Josh,
On 09/06/2021 01:11, Josh Don wrote:
[...]
> static void __maybe_unused cpu_period_quota_print(struct seq_file *sf,
> @@ -10306,6 +10318,12 @@ static struct cftype cpu_files[] = {
> .read_s64 = cpu_weight_nice_read_s64,
> .write_s64 = cpu_weight_nice_write_s64,
> },
> + {
> + .name = "idle",
> + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,
> + .read_s64 = cpu_idle_read_s64,
> + .write_s64 = cpu_idle_write_s64,
> + },
Any reason why this should only work on cgroup-v2?
struct cftype cpu_legacy_files[] vs. cpu_files[]
[...]
> @@ -11340,10 +11408,14 @@ void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(shares_mutex);
>
> -int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, unsigned long shares)
> +#define IDLE_WEIGHT sched_prio_to_weight[ARRAY_SIZE(sched_prio_to_weight) - 1]
Why not 3 ? Like for tasks (WEIGHT_IDLEPRIO)?
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists