[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATuzry1MUj-VruOVUwU_nH2xJd_2SxD_s_Z1QBb3PVnQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 11:03:31 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-parisc compile failure in current git
Hi Helge,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 7:50 AM Helge Deller <deller@....de> wrote:
>
> On 6/1/21 12:21 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > Upstream Linux git fails to compile on gentoo hppa - .config below.
> > I have 2 gcc-s as always:
> > $ gcc-config -l
> > [1] hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-9.3.0
> > [2] hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-10.2.0 *
> >
> > [3] hppa64-unknown-linux-gnu-10.2.0 *
>
>
> I see the same issue too, but only when compiling natively on a parisc machine.
> Cross-compiling on a x86 box works nicely.
>
> First I thought it's a problem with setting the "cross_compiling" flag in ./Makefile.
> But that's not sufficient.
>
> On a x86 machine (which builds fine) I get
> SRCARCH=parisc SUBARCH=x86 UTS_MACHINE=parisc
> The arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c file gets preprocessed via:
> hppa64-linux-gnu-gcc
>
> On a native 32bit parisc machine I have:
> SRCARCH=parisc SUBARCH=parisc UTS_MACHINE=parisc
> Here the arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c file gets preprocessed via:
> gcc
> Instead here the native hppa64-linux-gnu-gcc (cross compiler) should have been used too, since
> we build a 64-bit hppa kernel (CONFIG_64BIT is set).
> Note, on hppa we don't have an "-m64" compiler flag as on x86.
I see.
hppa is not a bi-arch compiler, in other words,
http- and hppa64- are separate compilers.
>
> Mashahiro, do you maybe have an idea what gets wrong here, or which
> patch has changed the behaviour how the asm-offsets.c file gets preprocessed?
Presumably, commit 23243c1ace9fb4eae2f75e0fe0ece8e3219fb4f3
Prior to that commit, arch/parisc/Makefile was like this:
ifneq ($(SUBARCH),$(UTS_MACHINE))
ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
...
Now I understand why arch/parisc/Makefile was written this way.
Reverting the change in arch/parisc/Makefile will restore the original behavior.
But, please keep in mind that there is an issue remaining.
Please see this code:
ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
UTS_MACHINE := parisc64
CHECKFLAGS += -D__LP64__=1
CC_ARCHES = hppa64
LD_BFD := elf64-hppa-linux
else # 32-bit
CC_ARCHES = hppa hppa2.0 hppa1.1
LD_BFD := elf32-hppa-linux
endif
UTS_MACHINE is determined by CONFIG_64BIT.
CONFIG_64BIT is defined only after Kconfig is finished.
When you are trying to configure the .config,
CONFIG_64BIT is not defined yet.
So UTS_MACHINE is always 'parisc'.
As you know, Kconfig files now have a bunch of 'cc-option' syntax
to check the compiler capability in Kconfig time.
Hence, you need to provide a proper compiler in Kconfig time too.
When you build a 64-bit parisc kernel on a 32-bit parisc machine,
Kconfig is passed with CC=gcc since SUBARCH==UTS_MACHINE==parisc.
After Kconfig, CROSS_COMPILE=hppa64-* is set,
and the kernel is built by CC=hppa64-*-gcc.
So, Kconfig evaluated a compiletely different compiler. This is pointless.
There are some options
[option 1]
revert the parisc bit of 23243c1ace9fb4eae2f75e0fe0ece8e3219fb4f3
This will restore the functionality you may want, but
as I said above, Kconfig is doing pointless things.
[option 2]
Stop using cc-cross-prefix, and pass CROSS_COMPILE explicitly.
This is what many architectures including arm, arm64 do.
You need to explicitly pass CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- etc.
if you are cross-compiling arm64.
[option 3]
Introduce ARCH=parisc64.
When you are building 64-bit kernel, you can pass ARCH=parisc64
A patch attached. (but not tested much)
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Download attachment "parisc64.diff" of type "application/x-patch" (1573 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists