[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210610210659.00003155@163.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:06:59 +0800
From: Chunyou Tang <tangchunyou@....com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com,
alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
tangchunyou@...becorp.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
tangchunyou <tangchunyou@....icubecorp.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modified: gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c
Hi Steven,
> > The GPU exception fault status register(0x3C),the low 8 bit is the
> > EXCEPTION_TYPE.We can see the description at P3-78 in spec.
You can see the spec
<arm_heimdall_technical_reference_manual_100612_0001_00_en.pdf>.
> However this change is correct - panfrost_exception_name() should be
> taking only the lower 8 bits. Even better though would be to to report
> the full raw fault information as well as the high bits can contain
> useful information:
>
> dev_warn(pfdev->dev, "GPU Fault 0x%08x (%s) at 0x%016llx\n",
> fault_status,
> panfrost_exception_name(pfdev, fault_status & 0xFF),
> address);
So I change it according to what you said?
δΊ Thu, 10 Jun 2021 11:41:52 +0100
Steven Price <steven.price@....com> ει:
> The subject should have the prefix "drm/panfrost" and should mention
> what the patch is changing (not just the filename).
>
> On 09/06/2021 07:38, ChunyouTang wrote:
> > From: tangchunyou <tangchunyou@....icubecorp.cn>
> >
> > The GPU exception fault status register(0x3C),the low 8 bit is the
> > EXCEPTION_TYPE.We can see the description at P3-78 in spec.
>
> Nit: When referring to a spec it's always good to mention the name -
> I'm not sure which specification you found this in.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: tangchunyou <tangchunyou@....icubecorp.cn>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c index
> > 2aae636f1cf5..1fffb6a0b24f 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c +++
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static
> > irqreturn_t panfrost_gpu_irq_handler(int irq, void *data) address
> > |= gpu_read(pfdev, GPU_FAULT_ADDRESS_LO);
> > dev_warn(pfdev->dev, "GPU Fault 0x%08x (%s) at
> > 0x%016llx\n",
> > - fault_status & 0xFF,
> > panfrost_exception_name(pfdev, fault_status),
> > + fault_status & 0xFF,
> > panfrost_exception_name(pfdev, fault_status & 0xFF),
>
> However this change is correct - panfrost_exception_name() should be
> taking only the lower 8 bits. Even better though would be to to report
> the full raw fault information as well as the high bits can contain
> useful information:
>
> dev_warn(pfdev->dev, "GPU Fault 0x%08x (%s) at 0x%016llx\n",
> fault_status,
> panfrost_exception_name(pfdev, fault_status & 0xFF),
> address);
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> > address);
> >
> > if (state & GPU_IRQ_MULTIPLE_FAULT)
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists