[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMIeTEYwzmKdrMqG@t490s>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:14:36 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Wang Yugui <wangyugui@...-tech.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm: page_vma_mapped_walk(): use page for pvmw->page
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:55:22AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > @@ -234,9 +233,9 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
> > return true;
> > next_pte:
> > /* Seek to next pte only makes sense for THP */
> > - if (!PageTransHuge(pvmw->page) || PageHuge(pvmw->page))
> > + if (!PageTransHuge(page) || PageHuge(page))
> > return not_found(pvmw);
> > - end = vma_address_end(pvmw->page, pvmw->vma);
> > + end = vma_address_end(page, pvmw->vma);
> > do {
> > pvmw->address += PAGE_SIZE;
> > if (pvmw->address >= end)
>
> I see two more pvmw->page in this loop. Do you leave them here as the code
> will be rewritten later in the patchset?
I think they've got removed in previous series ("[PATCH v2 04/10] mm/thp: fix
vma_address() if virtual address below file offset").
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists