[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210610153425.000029b6@Huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:34:25 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: core: Add "extended_name" attribute to all
channels
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:45:56 +0100
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net> wrote:
> The point of this new attribute is to make the IIO tree actually
> parsable.
>
> Before, given this attribute as a filename:
> in_voltage0_aux_sample_rate
>
> Userspace had no way to know if the attribute name was
> "aux_sample_rate" with no extended name, or "sample_rate" with "aux" as
> the extended name, or just "rate" with "aux_sample" as the extended
> name.
>
> This was somewhat possible to deduce when there was more than one
> attribute present for a given channel, e.g:
> in_voltage0_aux_sample_rate
> in_voltage0_aux_frequency
>
> There, it was possible to deduce that "aux" was the extended name. But
> even with more than one attribute, this wasn't very robust, as two
> attributes starting with the same prefix (e.g. "sample_rate" and
> "sample_size") would result in the first part of the prefix being
> interpreted as being part of the extended name.
>
> To address this issue, add an "extended_name" attribute to all channels
> that actually do have an extended name.
Change the patch title to make it clear that it only applies to those
that have extended_name set.
> For this attribute, the extended
> name is not present in the filename; so in this example, the file name
> would be "in_voltage0_extended_name", and reading it would return "aux".
Ah. Now I see the slightly issue with my immediate thought that we should
just put this in the label attribute (and not allow both extended_name
and label to be provided).
Hmm. It's a bit ugly but given it hopefully doesn't effect that many drivers
I could probably live with it.
However, needs a patch to Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
and a clear statement that this is for backwards compatibility reasons.
I don't want to see extended_name getting added to new drivers!
Jonathan
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> index ec34d930920c..4cdf9f092d73 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> @@ -723,6 +723,16 @@ static ssize_t iio_read_channel_label(struct device *dev,
> return indio_dev->info->read_label(indio_dev, this_attr->c, buf);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t iio_read_channel_extended_name(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + const struct iio_dev_attr *this_attr = to_iio_dev_attr(attr);
> + const struct iio_chan_spec *chan = this_attr->c;
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", chan->extend_name);
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t iio_read_channel_info(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> @@ -1185,6 +1195,32 @@ static int iio_device_add_channel_label(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static int
> +iio_device_add_channel_extended_name(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!chan->extend_name)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = __iio_add_chan_devattr("extended_name",
> + chan,
> + &iio_read_channel_extended_name,
> + NULL,
> + 0,
> + IIO_SEPARATE,
> + &indio_dev->dev,
> + NULL,
> + &iio_dev_opaque->channel_attr_list,
> + false);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int iio_device_add_info_mask_type(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> enum iio_shared_by shared_by,
> @@ -1327,6 +1363,11 @@ static int iio_device_add_channel_sysfs(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> return ret;
> attrcount += ret;
>
> + ret = iio_device_add_channel_extended_name(indio_dev, chan);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + attrcount += ret;
> +
> if (chan->ext_info) {
> unsigned int i = 0;
> for (ext_info = chan->ext_info; ext_info->name; ext_info++) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists