[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec192ad8-9ad7-d40a-02e6-07a0dec12607@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 18:09:56 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: nVMX: Drop redundant checks on vmcs12 in EPTP
switching emulation
On 10/06/21 01:42, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Drop the explicit checks on EPTP switching and EPT itself being enabled.
> The EPTP switching check is handled in the generic VMFUNC function check,
> the underlying VMFUNC enablement check is done by hardware and redone
> by generic VMFUNC emulation, and the vmcs12 EPT check is handled by KVM
> at VM-Enter in the form of a consistency check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 0075d3f0f8fa..479ec9378609 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -5448,10 +5448,6 @@ static int nested_vmx_eptp_switching(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u32 index = kvm_rcx_read(vcpu);
> u64 new_eptp;
>
> - if (!nested_cpu_has_eptp_switching(vmcs12) ||
> - !nested_cpu_has_ept(vmcs12))
> - return 1;
> -
Perhaps the EPT enabled check is worth keeping with a WARN_ON_ONCE?
Paolo
> if (index >= VMFUNC_EPTP_ENTRIES)
> return 1;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists