[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210611202434.flnqrzbbxicw5c3t@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:24:34 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Matthew Hagan <mnhagan88@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
soc@...nel.org, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: dts: NSP: Add Meraki MX64/MX65 to Makefile
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:27:14AM +0100, Matthew Hagan wrote:
> Add Makefile entries for the Meraki MX64/MX65 series devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Hagan <mnhagan88@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> index f8f09c5066e7..033d9604db60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -154,6 +154,12 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM_NSP) += \
> bcm958525xmc.dtb \
> bcm958622hr.dtb \
> bcm958623hr.dtb \
> + bcm958625-meraki-mx64.dtb \
> + bcm958625-meraki-mx64-a0.dtb \
> + bcm958625-meraki-mx64w.dtb \
> + bcm958625-meraki-mx64w-a0.dtb \
> + bcm958625-meraki-mx65.dtb \
> + bcm958625-meraki-mx65w.dtb \
> bcm958625hr.dtb \
> bcm988312hr.dtb \
> bcm958625k.dtb
> --
> 2.26.3
>
It is odd to add the device trees to the Makefile in a separate patch
compared to their actual introduction. Does the tree even compile at
this stage?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists