[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b581673-a5f7-f2a8-787c-f055082dc9d2@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:40:18 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
nguyenb@...eaurora.org, hongwus@...eaurora.org,
ziqichen@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] scsi: ufs: Differentiate status between hba pm ops
and wl pm ops
On 6/9/21 9:43 PM, Can Guo wrote:
> Put pm_op_in_progress and is_sys_suspend flags back to ufshcd hba pm ops,
> add two new flags, namely wl_pm_op_in_progress and is_wl_sys_suspended, to
> track the UFS device W-LU pm ops. This helps us differentiate the status of
> hba and wl pm ops when we need to do troubleshooting.
Since "WL" is an uncommon abbreviation, please add a comment above the
definition of struct ufs_hba that explains the meaning of the new member
variables.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists