linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] nvmem: sprd: Fix an error message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a34f8a9d-c9e7-5c2d-521f-13677cfd7ccb@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:05:40 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] nvmem: sprd: Fix an error message



On 11/06/2021 09:56, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:33:43AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>>
>> 'ret' is known to be 0 here.
>> The expected error status is stored in 'status', so use it instead.
>>
>> Also change %d in %u, because status is an u32, not a int.
>>
>> Fixes: 096030e7f449 ("nvmem: sprd: Add Spreadtrum SoCs eFuse support")
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>> Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c b/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c
>> index 5d394559edf2..e3e721d4c205 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c
>> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int sprd_efuse_raw_prog(struct sprd_efuse *efuse, u32 blk, bool doub,
>>   	status = readl(efuse->base + SPRD_EFUSE_ERR_FLAG);
>>   	if (status) {
>>   		dev_err(efuse->dev,
>> -			"write error status %d of block %d\n", ret, blk);
>> +			"write error status %u of block %d\n", status, blk);
> 
> Shouldn't this be %pe and not %u?

This is not error pointer its status value read back from a register.

I think %u should be good here.

--srini
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
>