linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:55:25 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, ~lkcamp/patches@...ts.sr.ht,
        nfraprado@...labora.com, leandro.ribeiro@...labora.com,
        Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>, lucmaga@...il.com,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>, tales.aparecida@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 01:39:58PM -0300, André Almeida wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patch converts existing UUID runtime test to use KUnit framework.
> 
> Below, there's a comparison between the old output format and the new
> one. Keep in mind that even if KUnit seems very verbose, this is the
> corner case where _every_ test has failed.

Btw, do we have test coverage statistics?

I mean since we reduced 18 test cases to 12, do we still have the same / better
test coverage?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko