[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hQ_7cdTNiXuFtmwiiLXxZ1WzxmLrPA+Hp4Tp7i-qS4EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:54:26 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Revert "cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for frequency invariance"
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:40 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 11-06-21, 09:37, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Alternatively: "depends on BROKEN" ?
>
> This is what I wanted to do, but Rafael didn't like it :)
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/28308fc0d38f252baf90e6ffb31fd2f8660be273.1623311808.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
Right.
For new things I prefer to either fix them properly before the release
or revert and redo in a better way in the next cycle.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists