[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874ke4y6e4.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:42:27 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+fb0b6a7e8713aeb0319c@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: Emulate triple fault shutdown if RSM
emulation fails
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> why don't we have triple fault printed in trace by default BTW???
>
> Or maybe trace_kvm_make_request()?
... or maybe just trace_kvm_check_request()?
$ git grep 'kvm_make_request(' arch/x86/kvm/ | wc -l
115
$ git grep 'kvm_check_request(' arch/x86/kvm/ | wc -l
41
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists