linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Calculate and check "full" mmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 18:02:04 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Calculate and check "full" mmu_role for
 nested MMU

On 11/06/21 00:00, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Calculate and check the full mmu_role when initializing the MMU context
> for the nested MMU, where "full" means the bits and pieces of the role
> that aren't handled by kvm_calc_mmu_role_common().  While the nested MMU
> isn't used for shadow paging, things like the number of levels in the
> guest's page tables are surprisingly important when walking the guest
> page tables.  Failure to reinitialize the nested MMU context if L2's
> paging mode changes can result in unexpected and/or missed page faults,
> and likely other explosions.
> 
> E.g. if an L1 vCPU is running both a 32-bit PAE L2 and a 64-bit L2, the
> "common" role calculation will yield the same role for both L2s.  If the
> 64-bit L2 is run after the 32-bit PAE L2, L0 will fail to reinitialize
> the nested MMU context, ultimately resulting in a bad walk of L2's page
> tables as the MMU will still have a guest root_level of PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL.
> 
>    WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 167334 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:3075 ept_save_pdptrs+0x15/0xe0 [kvm_intel]
>    Modules linked in: kvm_intel]
>    CPU: 4 PID: 167334 Comm: CPU 3/KVM Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1-d849817d5673-reqs #185
>    Hardware name: ASUS Q87M-E/Q87M-E, BIOS 1102 03/03/2014
>    RIP: 0010:ept_save_pdptrs+0x15/0xe0 [kvm_intel]
>    Code: <0f> 0b c3 f6 87 d8 02 00f
>    RSP: 0018:ffffbba702dbba00 EFLAGS: 00010202
>    RAX: 0000000000000011 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: ffffffff810a2c08
>    RDX: ffff91d7bc30acc0 RSI: 0000000000000011 RDI: ffff91d7bc30a600
>    RBP: ffff91d7bc30a600 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000007
>    R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff91d7bc30a600
>    R13: ffff91d7bc30acc0 R14: ffff91d67c123460 R15: 0000000115d7e005
>    FS:  00007fe8e9ffb700(0000) GS:ffff91d90fb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>    CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>    CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000029f15a001 CR4: 00000000001726e0
>    Call Trace:
>     kvm_pdptr_read+0x3a/0x40 [kvm]
>     paging64_walk_addr_generic+0x327/0x6a0 [kvm]
>     paging64_gva_to_gpa_nested+0x3f/0xb0 [kvm]
>     kvm_fetch_guest_virt+0x4c/0xb0 [kvm]
>     __do_insn_fetch_bytes+0x11a/0x1f0 [kvm]
>     x86_decode_insn+0x787/0x1490 [kvm]
>     x86_decode_emulated_instruction+0x58/0x1e0 [kvm]
>     x86_emulate_instruction+0x122/0x4f0 [kvm]
>     vmx_handle_exit+0x120/0x660 [kvm_intel]
>     kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xe25/0x1cb0 [kvm]
>     kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x211/0x5a0 [kvm]
>     __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
>     do_syscall_64+0x40/0xb0
>     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> 
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: bf627a928837 ("x86/kvm/mmu: check if MMU reconfiguration is needed in init_kvm_nested_mmu()")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 0144c40d09c7..8d5876dfc6b7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -4739,9 +4739,33 @@ static void init_kvm_softmmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	context->inject_page_fault = kvm_inject_page_fault;
>   }
>   
> +static union kvm_mmu_role kvm_calc_nested_mmu_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	union kvm_mmu_role role = kvm_calc_shadow_root_page_role_common(vcpu, false);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Nested MMUs are used only for walking L2's gva->gpa, they never have
> +	 * shadow pages of their own and so "direct" has no meaning.   Set it
> +	 * to "true" to try to detect bogus usage of the nested MMU.
> +	 */
> +	role.base.direct = true;
> +
> +	if (!is_paging(vcpu))
> +		role.base.level = 0;
> +	else if (is_long_mode(vcpu))
> +		role.base.level = is_la57_mode(vcpu) ? PT64_ROOT_5LEVEL :
> +						       PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
> +	else if (is_pae(vcpu))
> +		role.base.level = PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL;
> +	else
> +		role.base.level = PT32_ROOT_LEVEL;
> +
> +	return role;
> +}
> +
>   static void init_kvm_nested_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
> -	union kvm_mmu_role new_role = kvm_calc_mmu_role_common(vcpu, false);
> +	union kvm_mmu_role new_role = kvm_calc_nested_mmu_role(vcpu);
>   	struct kvm_mmu *g_context = &vcpu->arch.nested_mmu;
>   
>   	if (new_role.as_u64 == g_context->mmu_role.as_u64)
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo