[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50dea657-ef03-4bde-b9c7-75d9e18157ea@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 18:50:24 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Hyper-V nested virt enlightenments for SVM
On 11/06/21 11:44, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Yea, reported already:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/683fa50765b29f203cb4b0953542dc43226a7a2f.camel@redhat.com/T/#mf732ba9567923d800329f896761e4ee104475894
And that's how I learnt that 1) IS_ENABLED != #ifdef for modules 2)
CONFIG_HYPERV=m is possible. Sorry Vineeth for clobbering your
perfectly fine patch!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists