[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ee74cbed729d66a38a5c7de9c4608d02fb89f26.camel@themaw.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:43:13 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>,
Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@...il.com>,
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] kernfs: use VFS negative dentry caching
On Sat, 2021-06-12 at 00:07 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 04:50:27PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> > + if (d_really_is_negative(dentry)) {
> > + struct dentry *d_parent = dget_parent(dentry);
> > + struct kernfs_node *parent;
>
> What the hell is dget_parent() for? You don't do anything blocking
> here, so why not simply grab dentry->d_lock - that'll stabilize
> the value of ->d_parent just fine. Just don't forget to drop the
> lock before returning and that's it...
Thanks Al, I'll change it.
>
> > + /* If the kernfs parent node has changed discard
> > and
> > + * proceed to ->lookup.
> > + */
> > + parent = kernfs_dentry_node(d_parent);
> > + if (parent) {
> > + if (kernfs_dir_changed(parent, dentry)) {
> > + dput(d_parent);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + dput(d_parent);
> > +
> > + /* The kernfs node doesn't exist, leave the dentry
> > + * negative and return success.
> > + */
> > + return 1;
> > + }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists