[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eed6zx4q.fsf@disp2133>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:44:05 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Charles Haithcock <chaithco@...hat.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>,
Adrian Reber <areber@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8] exec: Fix dead-lock in de_thread with ptrace_attach
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:31:42 +0200 Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de> wrote:
>
>> This introduces signal->unsafe_execve_in_progress,
>> which is used to fix the case when at least one of the
>> sibling threads is traced, and therefore the trace
>> process may dead-lock in ptrace_attach, but de_thread
>> will need to wait for the tracer to continue execution.
>
> Deadlocks are serious. Is this exploitable by unprivileged userspace?
The processes are killable so I don't think this is the serious in the
way you mean. In fact Linus has already said that it is not a deadlock.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists