[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeOMb2xUJ+g2UQJnBybmehmYr0dGPEzDZObUGr=Q95+wA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 00:29:49 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] gpio: regmap: Add quirk for aliased data registers
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 12:13 AM Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net> wrote:
>
> Some chips have the read-only input and write-only output data registers
> aliased to the same offset. As a result it is not possible to perform
> read-modify-writes on the output values, when a line is still configured
> as input.
>
> Add a quirk for aliased data registers, and document how the regmap
> should be set up for correct operation.
I still believe that there is no issue with gpio-regmap and we don't
need any quirk there.
The issue is in the regmap APIs (implementation) itself. Hardware with
the concept of reading X / writing Y at the same offset is okay per
se. regmaps doesn't support it properly and should be fixed (amended)
in a way that you provide this kind of register description thru
regmap configuration or so.
I expressed the idea of trying to implement regmap-8250 as an example
of the support for such hardware. And OTOH that this kind of hardware
is not unusual.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists