linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] scsi: ufs: Complete the cmd before returning in queuecommand

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 13 Jun 2021 21:30:27 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:     asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
        hongwus@...eaurora.org, ziqichen@...eaurora.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] scsi: ufs: Complete the cmd before returning in
 queuecommand

On 2021-06-12 23:50, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 6/12/21 12:38 AM, Can Guo wrote:
>> On 2021-06-12 04:52, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 6/9/21 9:43 PM, Can Guo wrote:
>>>> @@ -2768,15 +2778,6 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct
>>>> Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>>>>      WARN_ON(ufshcd_is_clkgating_allowed(hba) &&
>>>>          (hba->clk_gating.state != CLKS_ON));
>>>> 
>>>> -    if (unlikely(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) {
>>>> -        if (hba->wl_pm_op_in_progress)
>>>> -            set_host_byte(cmd, DID_BAD_TARGET);
>>>> -        else
>>>> -            err = SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
>>>> -        ufshcd_release(hba);
>>>> -        goto out;
>>>> -    }
>>>> -
>>>>      lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
>>>>      WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
>>>>      lrbp->cmd = cmd;
>>> 
>>> Can the code under "if (unlikely(test_bit(tag,
>>> &hba->outstanding_reqs)))" be deleted instead of moving it? I don't
>>> think that it is useful to verify whether the block layer tag 
>>> allocator
>>> works correctly. Additionally, I'm not aware of any similar code in 
>>> any
>>> other SCSI LLD.
>> 
>> ufshcd_abort() aborts PM requests differently from other requests -
>> it simply evicts the cmd from lrbp [1], schedules error handler and
>> returns SUCCESS (the reason why I am doing it this way is in patch 
>> #8).
>> 
>> After ufshcd_abort() returns, the tag shall be released, the logic
>> here is to prevent subsequent cmds re-use the lrbp [1] before error
>> handler recovers the device and host.
> 
> Thanks for the background information. However, this approach sounds
> cumbersome to me. For PM requests, please change the UFS driver such
> that calling scsi_done() for aborted requests is postponed until error
> handling has finished and delete the code shown above from
> ufshcd_queuecommand().

I will delete the code in next version, since I believe the hba_state
checks before the code is enough to achieve the same purpose, so this
code becomes redundant.

Thanks,

Can Guo.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.