[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMddm2P0vD+4edBu@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:46:03 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, jlayton@...nel.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] afs: Fix afs_write_end() to handle short writes
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 02:37:12PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > > (1) If the page is not up to date, then we should just return 0
> > > (ie. indicating a zero-length copy). The loop in
> > > generic_perform_write() will go around again, possibly breaking up the
> > > iterator into discrete chunks.
> >
> > Does this actually work? What about the situation where you're reading
> > the last page of a file and thus (almost) always reading fewer bytes
> > than a PAGE_SIZE?
>
> Al Viro made such a change for Ceph - and we're writing, not reading.
I'd feel better if you said "xfstests doesn't show any new problems"
than arguing to authority.
I know the operation which triggers this path is a call to write(),
but if, say, the file is 32 bytes long, not in cache, and you write
bytes 32-63, the client must READ bytes 0-31 from the server, which
is less than a full page.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists