linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v37 3/4] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Jun 2021 06:48:31 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     "yohan.joung@...com" <yohan.joung@...com>
CC:     "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "d_hyun.kwon@...sung.com" <d_hyun.kwon@...sung.com>,
        "daejun7.park@...sung.com" <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "huobean@...il.com" <huobean@...il.com>,
        "j-young.choi@...sung.com" <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        "jaemyung.lee@...sung.com" <jaemyung.lee@...sung.com>,
        "jaeyoung21.choi@...com" <jaeyoung21.choi@...com>,
        "javier.gonz@...sung.com" <javier.gonz@...sung.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "jh.i.park@...sung.com" <jh.i.park@...sung.com>,
        "jieon.seol@...sung.com" <jieon.seol@...sung.com>,
        "keosung.park@...sung.com" <keosung.park@...sung.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "sungjun07.park@...sung.com" <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v37 3/4] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region

> > > >+      /*
> > > >+       * If the region state is active, mctx must be allocated.
> > > >+       * In this case, check whether the region is evicted or
> > > >+       * mctx allcation fail.
> > > >+       */
> > > >+      if (unlikely(!srgn->mctx)) {
> > > >+              dev_err(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
> > > >+                      "no mctx in region %d subregion %d.\n",
> > > >+                      srgn->rgn_idx, srgn->srgn_idx);
> > > >+              return true;
> > > >+      }
> > > >+
> > > >+      if ((srgn_offset + cnt) > bitmap_len)
> > > >+              bit_len = bitmap_len - srgn_offset;
> > > >+      else
> > > >+              bit_len = cnt;
> > > >+
> > > >+      if (find_next_bit(srgn->mctx->ppn_dirty, bitmap_len,
> > > >+                        srgn_offset) < bit_len + srgn_offset)
> > > >+              return true;
> > > >+
> > >
> > > It seems unnecessary to search through bitmap_len
> > > How about searching by transfer size?
> > >
> > > if (find_next_bit(srgn->mctx->ppn_dirty,
> > >               bit_len + srgn_offset, srgn_offset) < bit_len + srgn_offset)
> > Isn't bit_len should be used for size, and not bit_len + srgn_offset ?
> 
> then find_next_bit checks from start to bit_len.
> find_next_bit stops checking if start is greater than bit_len.
> it does not check for dirty as transfer_size.
Right. Size (nbits in _find_next_bit) practically means @end - Confusing...
Either way, Is this tad optimization worth another spin in your opinion?

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks
> Yohan
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Avri
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Yohan