lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d517106f-64ba-5d3a-59f5-c87d5e032bdc@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:21:33 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] memory-hotplug.rst: complete admin-guide overhaul

On 14.06.21 01:20, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> writes:
> 
>> This is v3 of the memory hot(un)plug admin-guide overhaul.
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - Added ACKs and RBs (thanks!)
>> - s/aarch64/arm64/
>> - Refine error handling when onlining/offlining
>> - s/memory hotplug/memory offlining/ in the vmemmap optimization section
>>    for huge pages
> 
> So this set doesn't apply to docs-next, even when I correct for the fact
> that you didn't make the patch from the top-level kernel directory.

Hi Jon,

oh, looks like I messed up v3 by git-format-patching from the wrong 
directory ...

> What tree is this against?
> 

Essentially against Andrew's mmotm, which already contains v1. Note 
mmotm was chosen due to a conflict in:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510030027.56044-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com

I'd suggest we take this via Andrew's tree, unless you have other 
preference on how to handle the conflict. Thanks!

> Thanks,
> 
> jon
> 


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ