[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3355688.ByQz1z8koQ@linux.local>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:33:55 +0200
From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Remove unnecessary tests and cast before kfree/kvfree
Hi All,
I've seen that some patches of mine, more recent the following ones, have
already been applied. In the past I had noticed that the patches are
(usually?) placed in a time of submission ordered FIFO, unless they are
rejected.
I'm wondering if I should re-send them or if I am missing some details about
the specific workflow of staging/media.
Thanks,
Fabio
On Saturday, June 5, 2021 4:08:53 AM CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> (1/2) Removed unnecessary test of pointers != NULL before passing them to
> kfree() and kvfree().
> (2/2) Removed an unnecessary (void *) cast for an argument passed to
kfree().
>
> v1 -> v2: Added patch 2/2.
>
> Fabio M. De Francesco (2):
> staging: media: atomisp: pci: Remove checks before kfree/kvfree
> staging: media: atomisp: pci: Remove unnecessary (void *) cast
>
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_firmware.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists