[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkV8DLKJb7h_=6mUb_V=qdmBaCqNMU8scaBhpqF7yeeMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:03:15 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcov,x86: Mark GCOV broken for x86
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:21 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:05:35AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > __attribute__((no_instrument_function)) is already wired to not emit
> > calls to mcount()/fentry(). I think extending it to also apply to
> > coverage (-fprofile-arcs) and instrumentation based profiling
> > (-fprofile-generate) is reasonable.
>
> Is anyone going to ping the gcc folks so that they do it too or should
> we open a bug over there simply?
Yes, I will file a bug (or two) against GCC and then post the links on
the other thread (re: pgo) since that already has the toolchains
mailing list cc'ed.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists