[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMe3eoodEyT+r1oI@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:09:30 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
WeiXiong Liao <gmpy.liaowx@...il.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore/blk: Use the normal block device I/O path
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:04:21PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> static ssize_t psblk_generic_blk_write(const char *buf, size_t bytes,
> loff_t pos)
> {
> /* Console/Ftrace backend may handle buffer until flush dirty zones */
> if (in_interrupt() || irqs_disabled())
> return -EBUSY;
> + return kernel_write(psblk_file, buf, bytes, &pos);
In which locking environments could that be called? The checks above
look like that thing could be called from just about any context;
could that happen when the caller is holding a page locked?
IOW, what are those checks really trying to do?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists