linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 05/10] irqchip: Add ACLINT software interrupt driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a6nsrdkm.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:38:17 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc:     Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 05/10] irqchip: Add ACLINT software interrupt driver

On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 13:25:40 +0100,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 3:11 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry, but this really isn't an irqchip driver. This is a piece of
> > arch-specific code that uses *none* of the irq subsystem abstractions
> > apart from the IRQCHIP_DECLARE() macro.
> 
> Yes, I was not sure we can call it IRQCHIP hence the RFC PATCH.
> 
> Both ACLINT MSWI and SSWI are special devices providing only IPI
> support so I will re-think how to fit this.

It depends on how you think of IPIs in your architecture.

arm64 (and even now 32bit) have been moved to a mode where IPIs are
normal interrupts, as it helps with other things such as our pseudo
NMIs, and reduces code duplication. MIPS has done the same for a long
time (they don't have dedicated HW for that).

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.