[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a39c53f5-2b87-22c4-1df2-d92988682362@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:21:24 +0800
From: "lipeng (Y)" <lipeng321@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <xie.he.0141@...il.com>,
<ms@....tdt.de>, <willemb@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: z85230: remove redundant
initialization for statics
在 2021/6/14 0:22, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 03:38:16PM +0800, Guangbin Huang wrote:
>> From: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
>>
>> Should not initialise statics to 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wan/z85230.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
>> index 94ed9a2..f815bb5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
>> @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ irqreturn_t z8530_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> {
>> struct z8530_dev *dev=dev_id;
>> u8 intr;
>> - static volatile int locker=0;
>> + static int locker;
> Is the volatile unneeded? Please document that in the commit message.
>
> Andrew
> .
Hi, Andrew:
When i create this patch, it will WARNING: Use of volatile is usually
wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
According to the file in kernel:
Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
the "volatile" type class should not be used.
So i remove "volatile" in this patch.
I will add the reason in commit log Next version.
Thanks.
Peng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists