[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210614102643.790442311@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:27:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+142c9018f5962db69c7e@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 34/42] perf: Fix data race between pin_count increment/decrement
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
commit 6c605f8371159432ec61cbb1488dcf7ad24ad19a upstream.
KCSAN reports a data race between increment and decrement of pin_count:
write to 0xffff888237c2d4e0 of 4 bytes by task 15740 on cpu 1:
find_get_context kernel/events/core.c:4617
__do_sys_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:12097 [inline]
__se_sys_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:11933
...
read to 0xffff888237c2d4e0 of 4 bytes by task 15743 on cpu 0:
perf_unpin_context kernel/events/core.c:1525 [inline]
__do_sys_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:12328 [inline]
__se_sys_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:11933
...
Because neither read-modify-write here is atomic, this can lead to one
of the operations being lost, resulting in an inconsistent pin_count.
Fix it by adding the missing locking in the CPU-event case.
Fixes: fe4b04fa31a6 ("perf: Cure task_oncpu_function_call() races")
Reported-by: syzbot+142c9018f5962db69c7e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210527104711.2671610-1-elver@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3782,7 +3782,9 @@ find_get_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct
cpuctx = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, cpu);
ctx = &cpuctx->ctx;
get_ctx(ctx);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
++ctx->pin_count;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
return ctx;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists