[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210614102644.890761049@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:27:16 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 33/67] btrfs: return value from btrfs_mark_extent_written() in case of error
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
commit e7b2ec3d3d4ebeb4cff7ae45cf430182fa6a49fb upstream.
We always return 0 even in case of an error in btrfs_mark_extent_written().
Fix it to return proper error value in case of a failure. All callers
handle it.
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ int btrfs_mark_extent_written(struct btr
int del_nr = 0;
int del_slot = 0;
int recow;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode);
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
@@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ again:
}
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists