lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:10:21 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:     Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on
 unthrottle

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 02:01:55PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 13:31, Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al> wrote:
> >
> > This fixes an issue where fairness is decreased since cfs_rq's can
> > end up not being decayed properly. For two sibling control groups with
> > the same priority, this can often lead to a load ratio of 99/1 (!!).
> >
> > This happen because when a cfs_rq is throttled, all the descendant cfs_rq's
> 
> s/happen/happens/
> 
> > will be removed from the leaf list. When they initial cfs_rq is
> > unthrottled, it will currently only re add descendant cfs_rq's if they
> > have one or more entities enqueued. This is not a perfect heuristic.
> >
> > Instead, we insert all cfs_rq's that contain one or more enqueued
> > entities, or it its load is not completely decayed.
> >
> > Can often lead to situations like this for equally weighted control
> > groups:
> >
> > $ ps u -C stress
> > USER         PID %CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME COMMAND
> > root       10009 88.8  0.0   3676   100 pts/1    R+   11:04   0:13 stress --cpu 1
> > root       10023  3.0  0.0   3676   104 pts/1    R+   11:04   0:00 stress --cpu 1
> >
> > Fixes: 31bc6aeaab1d ("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()")
> > Signed-off-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>
> 
> minor typo in the commit message otherwise
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ