[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFreV-RPzweG8SqFQtvZMOyFbaG2+tMFKc2JkbEj+erb=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:55:24 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM: domain: use per-genpd lockdep class
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 13:10, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:17:20PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
> > Beyond this, perhaps we should consider removing the
> > "regulator-fixed-domain" DT property, as to avoid similar problems
> > from cropping up?
>
> > Mark, what do you think?
>
> We need to maintain compatibility for existing users...
Normally, yes, I would agree.
In this case, it looks like there is only one user, which is somewhat
broken in regards to this, so what's the point of keeping this around?
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists