[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMjCA6sgzOThbt6Z@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:06:43 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>,
Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] kernfs: move revalidate to be near lookup
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 06:25:53PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> While the dentry operation kernfs_dop_revalidate() is grouped with
> dentry type functions it also has a strong affinity to the inode
> operation ->lookup().
>
> It makes sense to locate this function near to kernfs_iop_lookup()
> because we will be adding VFS negative dentry caching to reduce path
> lookup overhead for non-existent paths.
>
> There's no functional change from this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
> Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
> ---
> fs/kernfs/dir.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
As everyone has agreed this patch does nothing wrong, I've applied this
one for now while everyone reviews the other ones :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists