[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMjE2iwRFWVrfzLL@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:18:50 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC/mce_amd: Reduce unnecessary spew in dmesg if SMCA
feature bit is not exposed
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:08:46AM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> How about adding the the SMCA feature to the amd64_cpuids[] table in
> amd64_edac.c?
>
> We can use X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FEATURE to match on AMD (and Hygon) systems
> with SMCA. And we can remove the X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM entries for
> families 17h-19h.
Sure. That'll alleviate the need to add new families which support SMCA
too.
> I'm assuming the issue is that amd64_edac_mod is autoloading due to the
> family-based device table, and this will load edac_mce_amd as a
> dependency.
Is it?
We have
early_initcall(mce_amd_init);
in mce_amd.c which attempts to load this thing unconditionally.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists