[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210615114229.3b1f2c5f@oasis.local.home>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:42:29 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Matt Helsley <mhelsley@...are.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <yj.chiang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] recordmcount: Correct st_shndx handling
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:47:20 +0800
Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com> wrote:
> One should only use st_shndx when >SHN_UNDEF and <SHN_LORESERVE. When
> SHN_XINDEX, then use .symtab_shndx. Otherwise use 0.
>
> This handles the case: st_shndx >= SHN_LORESERVE && st_shndx != SHN_XINDEX.
>
> Reported-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
Please explain the two signed-off-by's above. If you are just tweaking
Peter's original patch, please add at the start:
From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
And then just above your signed off by, add what you changed:
Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
[ Changed something ]
Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
But state what you changed.
Thanks!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists