[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKDf9W-1KHUoFFCoLareLKf0CAVMU6CXR22xW3hWM_8yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:44:21 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Alex Nemirovsky <Alex.Nemirovsky@...tina-access.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Li <jason.li@...tina-access.com>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: serial: Convert Cortina-Access UART
to json-schema
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:39 AM Alex Nemirovsky
<Alex.Nemirovsky@...tina-access.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 15, 2021, at 7:13 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 01:36:39PM +0000, Alex Nemirovsky wrote:
> >> MAINTAINERS modification was made in the initial version 1. We made no changes to it since then,
> >> thus not sure what we could at to Changelog which would add value or clarity for others
> >> from the v1.
> >>
> >>> On Jun 15, 2021, at 4:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 11:45:17AM -0700, Alex Nemirovsky wrote:
> >>>> From: Jason Li <jason.li@...tina-access.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Convert the Cortina-Access UART binding to DT schema format.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Li <jason.li@...tina-access.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> .../serial/cortina-access,serial.yaml | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 +
> >>>> MAINTAINERS | 6 +++
> >>>
> >>> You are also adding a MAINTAINERS entry here, which is not listed in the
> >>> changelog text, so I couldn't take it anyway :(
> >
> > Add the maintainers entry in the first patch, with the driver please.
>
> The change to MAINTAINERS here add a new file into the DT documentation.
> Should it not be grouped into the dt-binding portion and reviewed by the DT time for which this patch
> is CC’ed to? Why would moving the DT documentation file that is introduced be into the first patch, which is the
> serial driver itself be the correct approach?
The binding doesn't actually need a MAINTAINERS entry (though having
one is fine). get_maintainers.pl will also pull emails from the
binding schema.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists