linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mstar for v5.14 v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFr9PXkeqryzutzpV6woskee_SwbDMJFgxPtspvTk0-VS6A5xA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:03:49 +0900
From:   Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>,
        Mohammed Billoo <mohammed.billoo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mstar for v5.14 v2

Hi Olof,

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 00:31, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> This time it seems like you based your branch on 5.14-rc5, which is a newer -rc
> than what we have the rest of our trees on. The general rule of thumb is to
> base it on the oldest meaningful rc for the release (rc1 or rc2, most of the
> time). We normally base our tree on rc2 or so, in this case I went forward to
> rc3 earlier.

Sorry, I hadn't even thought of that but it makes sense.

> (Maybe you had the same base last time around, and I missed it -- my tooling
> failed out on the S-o-b checking before I noticed)

Last one was rc5 too.

> To avoid another roundtrip here, I'll apply the two patches directly, but
> please keep it in mind in the future, especially once you have more material
> for a cycle.

Thanks for doing that and the hand holding. I think I can manage to
get it right next time. :)

I have one DTS patch I would like to get into 5.14 for the watchdog
driver that was recently accepted.
Is it still ok to send a PR for that one or is it too late now? I
think I read the cut off is around rc6.

Thanks,

Daniel