lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:47:04 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the mtd
 tree

Hi Stephen,

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote on Tue, 15 Jun 2021
12:59:58 +1000:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,am654-hbmc.txt
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   6947ad674944 ("dt-bindings: mtd: Convert ti, am654-hbmc.txt to YAML schema")
> 
> from the mtd tree and commit:
> 
>   9b358af7c818 ("dt-bindings: mux: Convert mux controller bindings to schema")
> 
> from the devicetree tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the latter removed the file, so I just did that) and can
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> 

Thanks for the warning. Indeed the txt file being touched by
9b358af7c818 is being updated into a yaml file which does not reference
the mux binding anymore.

Rob, how do you want to proceed?

Thanks,
Miquèl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ