[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210615184704.4204347f@xps13>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:47:04 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the mtd
tree
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote on Tue, 15 Jun 2021
12:59:58 +1000:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,am654-hbmc.txt
>
> between commit:
>
> 6947ad674944 ("dt-bindings: mtd: Convert ti, am654-hbmc.txt to YAML schema")
>
> from the mtd tree and commit:
>
> 9b358af7c818 ("dt-bindings: mux: Convert mux controller bindings to schema")
>
> from the devicetree tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter removed the file, so I just did that) and can
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
Thanks for the warning. Indeed the txt file being touched by
9b358af7c818 is being updated into a yaml file which does not reference
the mux binding anymore.
Rob, how do you want to proceed?
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists