[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210615130702.0292284e@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:07:02 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<mhelsley@...are.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<samitolvanen@...gle.com>, <yj.chiang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] recordmcount: Correct st_shndx handling
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:32:45 +0800
Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:47:20 +0800
> > Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > > One should only use st_shndx when >SHN_UNDEF and <SHN_LORESERVE. When
> > > SHN_XINDEX, then use .symtab_shndx. Otherwise use 0.
> > >
> > > This handles the case: st_shndx >= SHN_LORESERVE && st_shndx != SHN_XINDEX.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> >
> > Please explain the two signed-off-by's above. If you are just tweaking
> > Peter's original patch, please add at the start:
> >
> > From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> >
> > And then just above your signed off by, add what you changed:
> >
> > Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> > [ Changed something ]
> > Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> >
> > But state what you changed.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -- Steve
>
> Sorry for messing up.
No problem. It's a learning process.
> I've fixed it in v3.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists