linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] iomap: Use __set_page_dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YMjkNd0zapLcooNB@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:32:37 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] iomap: Use __set_page_dirty_nobuffers

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:19:59PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:23:39PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Using __ functions in structures in different modules feels odd to me.
> Why not just have iomap_set_page_dirty be a #define to this function now
> if you want to do this?
> 
> Or take the __ off of the function name?
> 
> Anyway, logic here is fine, but feels odd.

heh, that was how I did it the first time.  Then I thought that it was
better to follow Christoph's patch:

 static const struct address_space_operations adfs_aops = {
+       .set_page_dirty = __set_page_dirty_buffers,
(etc)