[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210615174947.32057-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:55:45 +0206
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH next v3 0/2] introduce printk cpu lock
Hello,
While working on removing the safe buffers for printk [0] we
stumbled on a cpu-reentrant spinning lock used by dump_stack(). This
type of lock (dubbed a cpu lock) will cause deadlock risks once we
introduce atomic consoles because atomic consoles also need such a
lock.
Although we are not yet ready to introduce atomic consoles, this is
an appropriate time to provide an official cpu lock to be used for
all things relating to printk (including the atomic consoles, once
they are introduced).
This series is against next-20210615.
v2 can be found here [1].
Changes since v2:
- Remove @lock_flag argument from lock/unlock functions. Since there
is only 1 global printk cpu lock, the @lock_flag can be a static
global variable inside printk.c. Also, that flag is renamed to
@printk_cpulock_nested.
- Use typical irqsave/irqrestore calling conventions. This means
changing the lock/unlock functions to macros and set the irq flags
within those macros, rather than passing the irq flags as a
function argument.
- Split the lock function into 2 functions: trylock and wait. This
simplifies the macro implementation. Later, for atomic consoles,
this will be useful because atomic consoles will implement the
waiting component differently.
- Fix a "used uninitialized" warning for !CONFIG_SMP, reported by
the kbuild robot.
- Extend memory barrier comments to cover both "previous to current"
and "current to next" guarantees.
John Ogness
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YGW63%2FelFr%2FgYW1u@alley
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210607200232.22211-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de
John Ogness (2):
dump_stack: move cpu lock to printk.c
printk: fix cpu lock ordering
include/linux/printk.h | 41 +++++++++++++++
kernel/printk/printk.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/dump_stack.c | 38 +-------------
3 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists