[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMjuPtKtiaVLLO0q@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:15:26 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Yizhuo Zhai <yzhai003@....edu>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: hideep - fix the uninitialized use in
hideep_nvm_unlock()
Hi Yizhuo,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:26:09AM -0700, Yizhuo Zhai wrote:
> Inside function hideep_nvm_unlock(), variable "unmask_code" could
> be uninitialized if hideep_pgm_r_reg() returns error, however, it
> is used in the later if statement after an "and" operation, which
> is potentially unsafe.
I do not think that simply initializing the variable makes the code
behave any better. If we want to fix this properly we need to check for
errors returned by hideep_pgm_r_reg() and hideep_pgm_w_reg() and exit
this function early, signalling the caller about errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yizhuo <yzhai003@....edu>
> ---
> drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c
> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c
> index ddad4a82a5e5..49b713ad4384 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static int hideep_enter_pgm(struct hideep_ts *ts)
>
> static void hideep_nvm_unlock(struct hideep_ts *ts)
> {
> - u32 unmask_code;
> + u32 unmask_code = 0;
>
> hideep_pgm_w_reg(ts, HIDEEP_FLASH_CFG, HIDEEP_NVM_SFR_RPAGE);
> hideep_pgm_r_reg(ts, 0x0000000C, &unmask_code);
> --
> 2.17.1
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists