[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMj6N46ElCq/ndJJ@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 21:06:31 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@...eaurora.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, ohad@...ery.com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, psodagud@...eaurora.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] remoteproc: core: Cleanup device in case of
failure
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:03:44PM -0700, Siddharth Gupta wrote:
> When a failure occurs in rproc_add() it returns an error, but does
> not cleanup after itself. This change adds the failure path in such
> cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Why is this needed for stable kernels? And again, a Fixes: tag?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists