linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFCv4 4/4] lib/test_printf.c: add test cases for '%pD'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VeB68UUfz=6dO31zf59p6_5wGBX7etWJEV_xtLYsy=hBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:47:29 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Jia He <justin.he@....com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
        Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv4 4/4] lib/test_printf.c: add test cases for '%pD'

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 6:55 PM Jia He <justin.he@....com> wrote:
>
> After the behaviour of specifier '%pD' is changed to print full path
> of struct file, the related test cases are also updated.
>
> Given the string of '%pD' is prepended from the end of the buffer, the
> check of "wrote beyond the nul-terminator" should be skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
> ---
>  lib/test_printf.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c
> index d1d2f898ebae..9f851a82b3af 100644
> --- a/lib/test_printf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_printf.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>
>  #include <linux/bitmap.h>
>  #include <linux/dcache.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/socket.h>
>  #include <linux/in.h>
>
> @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ KSTM_MODULE_GLOBALS();
>
>  static char *test_buffer __initdata;
>  static char *alloced_buffer __initdata;
> +static bool is_prepended_buf __initdata;
>
>  extern bool no_hash_pointers;
>
> @@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ do_test(int bufsize, const char *expect, int elen,
>                 return 1;
>         }
>
> -       if (memchr_inv(test_buffer + written + 1, FILL_CHAR, bufsize - (written + 1))) {

> +       if (!is_prepended_buf && memchr_inv(test_buffer + written + 1, FILL_CHAR, bufsize - (written + 1))) {

Can it be parametrized? I don't like the custom test case being
involved here like this.

>                 pr_warn("vsnprintf(buf, %d, \"%s\", ...) wrote beyond the nul-terminator\n",
>                         bufsize, fmt);
>                 return 1;
> @@ -501,6 +503,27 @@ dentry(void)
>         test("  bravo/alfa|  bravo/alfa", "%12pd2|%*pd2", &test_dentry[2], 12, &test_dentry[2]);
>  }
>
> +static struct vfsmount test_vfsmnt __initdata = {};
> +
> +static struct file test_file __initdata = {
> +       .f_path = { .dentry = &test_dentry[2],
> +                   .mnt = &test_vfsmnt,
> +       },
> +};
> +
> +static void __init
> +f_d_path(void)
> +{
> +       test("(null)", "%pD", NULL);
> +       test("(efault)", "%pD", PTR_INVALID);
> +
> +       is_prepended_buf = true;
> +       test("/bravo/alfa   |/bravo/alfa   ", "%-14pD|%*pD", &test_file, -14, &test_file);
> +       test("   /bravo/alfa|   /bravo/alfa", "%14pD|%*pD", &test_file, 14, &test_file);
> +       test("   /bravo/alfa|/bravo/alfa   ", "%14pD|%-14pD", &test_file, &test_file);
> +       is_prepended_buf = false;
> +}
> +
>  static void __init
>  struct_va_format(void)
>  {
> @@ -784,6 +807,7 @@ test_pointer(void)
>         ip();
>         uuid();
>         dentry();
> +       f_d_path();
>         struct_va_format();
>         time_and_date();
>         struct_clk();
> --
> 2.17.1
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko