lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210616093422.31270f1e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:34:22 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [next] [arm64] kernel BUG at arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c

Hi all,

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:21:32 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:50:31AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > 
> > On 6/15/2021 9:19 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:  
> > > Looking some more, it looks like that's correct in isolation, but it
> > > clashes with commit:
> > > 
> > >   5831eedad2ac6f38 ("mm: replace CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES with CONFIG_NUMA")  
> > 
> > Just a data point. Reverting the commit alone fixed the same crash for me.  
> 
> Yeah, that commit didn't take into the account the change in
> pgdat_to_phys().
> 
> The patch below should fix it. In the long run I think we should get rid of
> contig_page_data and allocate NODE_DATA(0) for !NUMA case as well.
> 
> Andrew, can you please add this as a fixup to "mm: replace
> CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES with CONFIG_NUMA"?
> 
> 
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index a0e9cdb5bc38..6326cdf36c4f 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ size_t mem_section_usage_size(void)
>  
>  static inline phys_addr_t pgdat_to_phys(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
>  {
> -#ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> +#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
>  	return __pa_symbol(pgdat);
>  #else
>  	return __pa(pgdat);

Added to linux-next today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ