[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210615053159.GA5412@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:59 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: syzbot <syzbot+e4c1dd36fc6b98c50859@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in xfrm_selector_match
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:19:26PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 13c62f53 net/sched: act_ct: handle DNAT tuple collision
> git tree: net
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16635470300000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=770708ea7cfd4916
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e4c1dd36fc6b98c50859
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+e4c1dd36fc6b98c50859@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ./include/net/xfrm.h:838:23
> shift exponent -64 is negative
> CPU: 0 PID: 12625 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
> dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120
> ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x5a lib/ubsan.c:148
> __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold+0xb1/0x181 lib/ubsan.c:327
> addr4_match include/net/xfrm.h:838 [inline]
> __xfrm4_selector_match net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:201 [inline]
> xfrm_selector_match.cold+0x35/0x3a net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:227
> xfrm_state_look_at+0x16d/0x440 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:1022
This appears to be an xfrm_state object with an IPv4 selector
that somehow has a prefixlen (d or s) of 96.
AFAICS this is not possible through xfrm_user. OTOH it is not
obvious that af_key is entirely consistent in how it verifies
the prefix length, in particular, it seems to be possible for
two addresses with conflicting families to be provided as src/dst.
Can you confirm that this is indeed using af_key (a quick read
of the syzbot log seems to indicate that this is the case)?
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists