linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] cifsd: add server handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YMhgXsAez9jmeUkW@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:10:06 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, smfrench@...il.com,
        stfrench@...rosoft.com, willy@...radead.org,
        aurelien.aptel@...il.com, linux-cifsd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        senozhatsky@...omium.org, sandeen@...deen.net, aaptel@...e.com,
        hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        ronniesahlberg@...il.com, hch@....de, dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] cifsd: add server handler

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:48:39PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> +/* @FIXME clean up this code */

Hmm, should that be in a submitted codebase?

> +#define DATA_STREAM	1
> +#define DIR_STREAM	2

Should this use a named enum to document the usage a bit better?

> +#ifndef ksmbd_pr_fmt
> +#ifdef SUBMOD_NAME
> +#define ksmbd_pr_fmt(fmt)	"ksmbd: " SUBMOD_NAME ": " fmt
> +#else
> +#define ksmbd_pr_fmt(fmt)	"ksmbd: " fmt
> +#endif
> +#endif

Why not use the pr_fmt built into pr_*?  With that all the message
wrappers except for the _dbg one can go away.

Also can you please decided if this is kcifsd or ksmbd?  Using both
names is rather confusing.

> +#ifndef ____ksmbd_align
> +#define ____ksmbd_align		__aligned(4)
> +#endif

No need for the ifndef and all the _ prefixes.  More importantly from
a quick look it seems like none of the structures really needs the
attribute anyway.

> +#define KSMBD_SHARE_CONFIG_PATH(s)				\
> +	({							\
> +		char *p = (s)->____payload;			\
> +		if ((s)->veto_list_sz)				\
> +			p += (s)->veto_list_sz + 1;		\
> +		p;						\
> +	 })

Why no inline function?

> +/* @FIXME */
> +#include "ksmbd_server.h"

???