[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210615084259.yj5pmyjonfqcg7lg@ws.net.home>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:42:59 +0200
From: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Franzki <ifranzki@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Juergen Christ <jchrist@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: loop_set_block_size: loop0 () has still dirty pages (nrpages=2)
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 09:35:30AM +0200, Ingo Franzki wrote:
> However, shouldn't then the losetup userspace utility implement some kind of retry logic in case of -EAGAIN ?
> I don't see that in the source of losetup.c nor in loopdev.c in the util-linux package. There is a retry loop in create_loop() in losetup.c retrying loopcxt_setup_device() in case of EBUSY, but not in case of EAGAIN.
>
> And losetup also hides the original error code and just returns EXIT_FAILURE in case of a failure. So no real good chance for the script that uses losetup to catch that error situation and perform a retry itself.
>
> Adding Karel Zak (the maintainer of util-linux).
>
> @Karel Zak: How about adding EAGAIN to the condition for performing a retry?
>
> Something like this:
>
> - if (errno == EBUSY && !hasdev && ntries < 64) {
> + if ((errno == EBUSY || errno == EAGAIN) && !hasdev && ntries < 64) {
> xusleep(200000);
> ntries++;
> continue;
> }
EAGAIN sounds like the best reason to try it again :-)
Committed, it will be also available in v2.37.1.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists