lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1+cWFn8=xyGwZ0c7fWr6+tdEF_sXtMpPCZypDBA_UryA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:43:41 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>,
        Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] media: subdev: remove VIDIOC_DQEVENT_TIME32 handling

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 7:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:34:05PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > Converting the VIDIOC_DQEVENT_TIME32/VIDIOC_DQEVENT32/
> > VIDIOC_DQEVENT32_TIME32 arguments to the canonical form is done in common
> > code, but for some reason I ended up adding another conversion helper to
> > subdev_do_ioctl() as well. I must have concluded that this does not go
> > through the common conversion, but it has done that since the ioctl
> > handler was first added.
> >
> > I assume this one is harmless as there should be no way to arrive here
> > from user space, but since it is dead code, it should just get removed.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, this could be reached when
> !CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME, can't it ? Still, there's no need for this
> code in that case, so it seems fine to me.

Yes, that is correct, I missed that condition. We definitely should not handle
the command in that case.

Hans, since you mentioned you would pick up this patch, I assume  you
are going to reword the patch as you see fit. If you prefer me to resend it,
let me know.

       Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ