[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ce40daf1f8146f47b1877fb2c83cd95@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:26:11 +0530
From: sbhanu@...eaurora.org
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
stummala@...eaurora.org, vbadigan@...eaurora.org,
rampraka@...eaurora.org, sayalil@...eaurora.org,
sartgarg@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org, sibis@...eaurora.org,
okukatla@...eaurora.org, djakov@...nel.org, cang@...eaurora.org,
pragalla@...eaurora.org, nitirawa@...eaurora.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
agross@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add nodes for eMMC and SD
card
On 2021-06-14 17:00, sbhanu@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2021-06-11 09:12, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Wed 09 Jun 10:20 CDT 2021, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote:
>>
>>> Add nodes for eMMC and SD card on sc7280.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@...eaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This change is depends on the below patch series:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1418814/
>>>
>>> Change since V2:
>>> - Added leading zero's for register address and "qcom,sc7280-sdhci"
>>> string in compatible as suggested by Stephen Boyd and Doug.
>>> - Removed max-frequency flag, no-mmc and no-sdio flags for Sd
>>> card as suggested by Doug and Stephen Boyd.
>>> - Moved non-removable, no-sd, no-sdio and some pin config changes
>>> from soc to board dts file as suggested by Doug.
>>> - Removed sleep state for CD line and drive-strength for input pins
>>> as suggested by Doug.
>>> - Updated bus vote numbers for eMMC and SD card.
>>>
>>> Changes since V1:
>>> - Moved SDHC nodes as suggested by Bjorn Andersson.
>>> - Dropped "pinconf-" prefix as suggested by Bjorn
>>> Andersson.
>>> - Removed extra newlines as suggested by Konrad
>>> Dybcio.
>>> - Changed sd-cd pin to bias-pull-up in sdc2_off
>>> as suggested by Veerabhadrarao Badiganti.
>>> - Added bandwidth votes for eMMC and SD card.
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts | 79 +++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 146
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 225 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
>>> index 3900cfc..8b159d1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>> #include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmr735b.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmk8350.h>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>>> #include "sc7280.dtsi"
>>> #include "pm7325.dtsi"
>>> #include "pmr735a.dtsi"
>>> @@ -272,6 +273,36 @@
>>> status = "okay";
>>> };
>>>
>>> +&sdhc_1 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_clk &sdc1_cmd &sdc1_data &sdc1_rclk>;
>>> + pinctrl-1 = <&sdc1_clk_sleep &sdc1_cmd_sleep &sdc1_data_sleep
>>> &sdc1_rclk_sleep>;
>>> +
>>
>> Extra newline.
> Sure
>>
>>> +
>>> + non-removable;
>>> + no-sd;
>>> + no-sdio;
>>> +
>>> + vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l7b_2p9>;
>>> + vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l19b_1p8>;
>>> +
>>
>> Extra newline.
> Sure
>>
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&sdhc_2 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdc2_clk &sdc2_cmd &sdc2_data &sd_cd>;
>>> + pinctrl-1 = <&sdc2_clk_sleep &sdc2_cmd_sleep &sdc2_data_sleep>;
>>> +
>>> + vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l9c_2p9>;
>>> + vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l6c_2p9>;
>>> +
>>> + cd-gpios = <&tlmm 91 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> &uart5 {
>>> status = "okay";
>>> };
>>> @@ -291,3 +322,51 @@
>>> bias-pull-up;
>>> };
>>> };
>>> +
>>> +&tlmm {
>>> + sdc1_clk: sdc1-clk {
>>> + pins = "sdc1_clk";
>>> + bias-disable;
>>> + drive-strength = <16>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc1_cmd: sdc1-cmd {
>>> + pins = "sdc1_cmd";
>>> + bias-pull-up;
>>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc1_data: sdc1-data {
>>> + pins = "sdc1_data";
>>> + bias-pull-up;
>>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>>> + };
>>> + sdc1_rclk: sdc1-rclk {
>>> + pins = "sdc1_rclk";
>>> + bias-pull-down;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc2_clk: sdc2-clk {
>>> + pins = "sdc2_clk";
>>> + bias-disable;
>>> + drive-strength = <16>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc2_cmd: sdc2-cmd {
>>> + pins = "sdc2_cmd";
>>> + bias-pull-up;
>>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc2_data: sdc2-data {
>>> + pins = "sdc2_data";
>>> + bias-pull-up;
>>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sd_cd: sd-cd {
>>> + pins = "gpio91";
>>> + bias-pull-up;
>>> + };
>>
>> As Konrad pointed out, this is much cleaner described as:
>>
>> sdc1_default_state: sdc1-default-state {
>> clk {
>> };
>>
>> cmd {
>>
>> };
>>
>> data {
>>
>> };
>>
>> rclk {
>>
>> };
>> };
>>
>>> +
>>> +};
> Sure will change this in next version
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> index 0b6f119..eab6f7b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
>>>
>>> chosen { };
>>>
>>> + aliases {
>>> + mmc1 = &sdhc_1;
>>> + mmc2 = &sdhc_2;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> clocks {
>>> xo_board: xo-board {
>>> compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> @@ -430,6 +435,60 @@
>>> #mbox-cells = <2>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> + sdhc_1: sdhci@...000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +
>>> + reg = <0 0x007c4000 0 0x1000>,
>>> + <0 0x007c5000 0 0x1000>;
>>
>> Whenever you break lines, align your '<' on each line.
> ok
>>
>>> + reg-names = "hc", "cqhci";
>>> +
>>> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0xc0 0x0>;
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 652 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 656 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> + interrupt-names = "hc_irq", "pwr_irq";
>>> +
>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>,
>>> + <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
>>> + clock-names = "core", "iface", "xo";
>>> + interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_1 0 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1
>>> 0>,
>>> + <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0 &cnoc2 SLAVE_SDCC_1 0>;
>>> + interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>>> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7280_CX>;
>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
>>> +
>>> + bus-width = <8>;
>>> + supports-cqe;
>>> +
>>> + qcom,dll-config = <0x0007642c>;
>>> + qcom,ddr-config = <0x80040868>;
>>> +
>>> + mmc-ddr-1_8v;
>>> + mmc-hs200-1_8v;
>>> + mmc-hs400-1_8v;
>>> + mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe;
>>> +
>>> + sdhc1_opp_table: sdhc1-opp-table {
>>
>> No need for "sdhc1-" in the node name.
> ok
Hi,
For Sd card also we have opp-table info so if we remove "sdhc1-" here
and "sdhc2-" in Sd crad opp table we may have dublicate nodes so,
it is better to keep sdhc1 and sdhc2 in node numbers right.
Thanks,
Sajida
>>
>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>> +
>>> + opp-100000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <1800000 400000>;
>>> + opp-avg-kBps = <100000 0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + opp-384000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <5400000 1600000>;
>>> + opp-avg-kBps = <390000 0>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> qupv3_id_0: geniqup@...000 {
>>> compatible = "qcom,geni-se-qup";
>>> reg = <0 0x009c0000 0 0x2000>;
>>> @@ -973,6 +1032,51 @@
>>> };
>>> };
>>>
>>> + sdhc_2: sdhci@...4000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +
>>> + reg = <0 0x08804000 0 0x1000>;
>>> +
>>> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x100 0x0>;
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 207 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 223 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> + interrupt-names = "hc_irq", "pwr_irq";
>>> +
>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>,
>>> + <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
>>> + clock-names = "core", "iface", "xo";
>>> + interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 0 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1
>>> 0>,
>>> + <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0 &cnoc2 SLAVE_SDCC_2 0>;
>>> + interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>>> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7280_CX>;
>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
>>> +
>>> + bus-width = <4>;
>>> +
>>> + qcom,dll-config = <0x0007642c>;
>>> +
>>> + sdhc2_opp_table: sdhc2-opp-table {
>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>> +
>>> + opp-100000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <1800000 400000>;
>>> + opp-avg-kBps = <100000 0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + opp-202000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <5400000 1600000>;
>>> + opp-avg-kBps = <200000 0>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> system-cache-controller@...0000 {
>>> compatible = "qcom,sc7280-llcc";
>>> reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0xd0000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
>>> @@ -1102,6 +1206,48 @@
>>> pins = "gpio46", "gpio47";
>>> function = "qup13";
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + sdc1_clk_sleep: sdc1-clk-sleep {
>>> + pins = "sdc1_clk";
>>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>>> + bias-bus-hold;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc1_cmd_sleep: sdc1-cmd-sleep {
>>> + pins = "sdc1_cmd";
>>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>>> + bias-bus-hold;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc1_data_sleep: sdc1-data-sleep {
>>> + pins = "sdc1_data";
>>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>>> + bias-bus-hold;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc1_rclk_sleep: sdc1-rclk-sleep {
>>> + pins = "sdc1_rclk";
>>> + bias-bus-hold;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc2_clk_sleep: sdc2-clk-sleep {
>>> + pins = "sdc2_clk";
>>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>>> + bias-bus-hold;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc2_cmd_sleep: sdc2-cmd-sleep{
>>> + pins ="sdc2_cmd";
>>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>>> + bias-bus-hold;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sdc2_data_sleep: sdc2-data-sleep {
>>> + pins ="sdc2_data";
>>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>>> + bias-bus-hold;
>>> + };
>>
>> Please structure these as suggested above.
>>
> Sure
>>> +
>>
>> And please drop this empty line.
>>
> Sure
>> Thanks,
>> Bjorn
>>
>>> };
>>>
>>> apps_smmu: iommu@...00000 {
>>> --
>>> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
>>> member
>>> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists