lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <162375532027.2680644.15267910410598209844.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:06:50 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop SECTION_[SHIFT|SIZE|MASK]

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:48:26 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> SECTION_[SHIFT|SIZE|MASK] are essentially PMD_[SHIFT|SIZE|MASK]. But these
> create confusion being similar to generic sparsemem memory sections, which
> are derived from SECTION_SIZE_BITS. Section references have always implied
> PMD level block mapping. Instead just use all PMD level macros which would
> make it explicit and also remove confusion with sparsmem memory sections.

Applied to arm64 (for-next/mm), thanks!

[1/1] arm64/mm: Drop SECTION_[SHIFT|SIZE|MASK]
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/4aaa87ab3d2d

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ