linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: tlv320aic32x4: add support for TAS2505

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:39:42 +0200
From:   Claudius Heine <ch@...x.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sia Jee Heng <jee.heng.sia@...el.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Annaliese McDermond <nh6z@...z.net>,
        Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: tlv320aic32x4: add support for TAS2505

On 2021-06-15 14:22, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:49:31AM +0200, Claudius Heine wrote:
> 
>> +static int aic32x4_tas2505_spkdrv_putvol(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> +	struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
>> +{
>> +	struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
>> +	struct soc_mixer_control *mc =
>> +		(struct soc_mixer_control *)kcontrol->private_value;
>> +	u8 val;
>> +
>> +	val = (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] & 0x7f);
>> +	val = mc->invert ? mc->max - val : val;
>> +	val = (val < 0) ? 0 : val;
>> +	snd_soc_component_write(component, TAS2505_SPKVOL1, val);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> Controls should return a boolean indicating if they changed their value
> when written.  Other than the hard coded register what's device specific
> here?  It looks like a normal control with a maximum value, it is
> unclear why this is being open coded.

Well probably because I didn't knew any better. Will look into it. Thx!

> 
>> +	SOC_DOUBLE_R_S_TLV("HP Driver Gain Playback Volume", AIC32X4_HPLGAIN,
>> +			AIC32X4_HPLGAIN, 0, -0x6, 0x1d, 5, 0,
>> +			tlv_driver_gain),
> 
> Drop the Gain.  See control-names.rst.
> 

Ok.

Thanks!
Claudius